|

Ingo Schiffner at RIN11

At RIN11 Ingo Schiffner gave his presentation Mathematical Analysis of Pigeon Tracks (the characterisation of the underlying navigational process).

He analysed 167 tracks with birds navigating from four different locations and from two different directions.

His theory is that pigeons navigate using at least four different components and these components change over the course of the journey.  He considered mapping data (gradient/mosaic maps) to determine the course and compass (sun/magnetic) to locate the course and determine the flight direction.

He discovered that the correlation dimension lies in the range from 3.3-4.2 which shows that navigation is of a fractal nature (fractal systems are like the weather which allows short term prediction).  This is a chaotic – deterministic process.

His findings were:

  • That the pigeons did not change their performance over time and experience
  • The process was independent of previous experience
  • There is no switch in navigation strategy
  • That there are at least four independent factors involved
  • Additional factors come into play close to home
  • There is a simultaneous use of the Gradient and Mosaic map.

Mosaic Map
The mosaic map is a concept introduced by Wallraff it is the idea that a map can be arranged as a map of relative positions of landmarks (these may be visual landmarks, but could also be for example olfactory landmarks, like a patch of forest a patch of cornfield etc.)

Gradient Map
The gradient map is the idea that animals know the direction of different environmental gradients and can use this information to navigate within the known area and even extrapolate these gradients beyond familiar territory. (As opposed to the mosaic map, which cant be extrapolated).

Summary
The general consensus so far is that the gradient map is used for long/mid range navigation and the mosaic map for short range navigation. According to (Ingo Schiffner’s) findings the notion of these two different forms of maps is not easy to separate and most likely they overlap almost completely.

Similar Posts

  • How young animals learn to migrate

    While advances in biologging have revealed many spectacular animal migrations, it remains poorly understood how young animals learn to migrate. Even in social species, it is unclear how migratory skills are transmitted from one generation to another and what implications this may have. Here we show that in Caspian terns Hydroprogne caspia family groups, genetic and foster…

  • Avian Navigation

    www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17855194 Please look at this link as it covers important ground on Avian Navigation.  You will see that one of our heroes David Keays has established that the magnetite structure in the beaks of pigeons does not exist.  The magnetic theory still has problems because you cannot navigate using a compass without knowing where you…

  • Osprey navigation paths

    Intro>> The Rutland  (England) Osprey Project has been running for 18 years when Ospreys began to breed again on Rutland Water in the UK after 150 years. These birds are cared for by the Rutland Osprey Project who have fitted GPS trackers to some of these birds which give very accurate and detailed data of…

  • Navigation Networks in the Brain

    Professor Kate Jeffery of University College London gave the annual address to the Royal Institute of Navigation (RIN) this year (2014). This article published in RIN’s Navigation News is, for me, a seminal step forward in describing the parameters of animal navigation and building a structure to delve deeper into how navigation might work. Her idea that…

  • Animal Navigation Model

    Antonio Nafarrate, one of our associate editors has sent his latest thinking: I am very interested in how so much of what he presents here fits with other pieces in our puzzle to understand how Animal Navigation might work Richard Nissen editor I have some new ideas that may connect my Animal Navigation Model with…